The New York Times
Here There Is No WhyThe New York Times is the newspaper where Judah Loeb works as an investigative journalist and where his professional identity survives the collapse of his family life. It provides him with employment, assignments, and a disciplined outlet for the curiosity that shapes both his journalism and his pursuit of the truth about Chaim Lerner’s death.
Professional Anchor
The newspaper is part of Judah’s recovery after Mary Loeb’s suicide. Mary’s death leaves him drinking heavily for eight months and unable to care reliably for Hannah Loeb, who is five years old when she finds her mother’s body. After Ilana and Stan intervene and take Judah through rehabilitation, Judah moves with Hannah to Scarsdale, where Ilana manages the practical conditions of his return to ordinary life, including making sure that he showers, dresses, attends work at The New York Times, and reaches the train station. His continued employment is therefore not a minor background detail: it marks a fragile re-entry into responsibility after bereavement and self-destruction.
The newspaper also confirms Judah’s established professional disposition. He describes himself as an investigative journalist with a natural curiosity about a multitude of subjects, while recognizing that Hannah shares his fascination with popular culture, including Andy Warhol, Steely Dan, and Madonna. Yet Hannah deliberately withdraws her curiosity whenever Judah receives a Times assignment about a subject and then tries to discuss the resulting article with her. The family tension turns the newspaper into an intimate symbol as well as an employer: what gives Judah intellectual energy can make him seem overbearing to his daughter.
Journalism and Family Distance
Judah’s work repeatedly complicates communication with Hannah. Their conversations over dinner are restricted by her demanding schedule of soccer, cheerleading, debate, robotics, and schoolwork, leaving at most fifteen minutes for discussion. When Judah tries to introduce theology through one of Lerner’s books, Hannah redirects the exchange toward her robotics competition; when he tries to discuss his college years, she turns the conversation toward university applications and the prospects of Stanford, Columbia, and Northwestern. The newspaper’s presence is felt through this pattern of refusal, because Hannah has learned to treat Judah’s professional interests as subjects she will not share merely because they interest him.
This distance does not erase their intellectual resemblance. Judah sees in Hannah the same tenacious curiosity and pop-art fascinations that shape his own mind, but the newspaper has become a trigger for her resistance. The institution thus links them by inheritance while separating them in practice: Hannah resembles her father’s curiosity, yet rejects the authority of his assignments and interpretations.
From Assignment to Investigation
Judah’s work also supplies the initial professional logic for his involvement with Chaim Lerner. After Mary’s death, he becomes interested in the possibility that Lerner’s suicide could make the subject of a book, particularly because Lerner was a Holocaust survivor and had left no note. Judah later explains that he came to Israel not originally to solve a mystery but to write that book. His journalistic vocation converts a personal and historical tragedy into an investigative project, even as the project gradually becomes entangled with his own past.
The investigation acquires force through the methods associated with newspaper reporting: interviews, translated police reports, documentary evidence, receipts, witness testimony, and reconstruction of a timeline. Charlie gives Judah and Hannah files concerning Lerner’s death, including Lerner’s calendar, his handwritten Lebanon statement, receipts, and transcribed interviews. Five neighbors report hearing Lerner’s voice say “Whoops” before a heavy thump at seven p.m.; the family’s alibis are then tested against documentary records. The inquiry moves from a newspaper writer’s theory about a Holocaust-survivor suicide to a forensic examination of physical space, timing, and contradiction.
A wedding-dress receipt from Rafik’s Boutique becomes especially important. Michal states that she and Zehava Lerner were shopping for the dress when Chaim died, and the receipt records the date and time. Rafik Salahmi’s evidence confirms the purchase at 19:00 on May 5, 1983, while neighbors place the fall at approximately 18:30. Judah’s investigation therefore exposes the difference between an accepted public account and the material details that unsettle it.
Memory, Evidence, and the Public Record
The New York Times represents the public record that Judah knows how to construct, but his investigation ultimately depends on memories the record cannot initially contain. He remembers leaving Israel in 1983 after Michal’s decision to marry Yoav Lerner. Three days before his flight, Michal has intercourse with him for the first time, and he remembers the exact date and time because the night becomes his first intercourse and his first love. On the evening of his departure, he stops at Chaim’s home, sees the ambulance, and learns from Michal that Chaim is dead.
Years later, that private memory challenges the official alibi. Michal insists that she was shopping for her wedding dress, but Judah remembers that she was with him that night. When Zehava points out that Michal had already broken up with him and accepted Yoav’s proposal, Judah maintains that Michal was nevertheless with him. His memory becomes a form of evidence, although it is initially obscured by heartbreak and his inability to think beyond his own pain.
The delayed significance of the memory reveals both the strength and limitation of Judah’s professional habits. He first assumes that Chaim’s death is another Holocaust-writer suicide story and only later recognizes that the family’s false alibis implicate one of them. He recalls that Michal embraced him with only one arm when he arrived at the scene, and that she winced, indicating an injury to her left arm. This bodily detail, noticed before he understood its meaning, eventually helps him infer that Michal was involved in Chaim’s death.
Institutional Significance
The newspaper’s significance lies in the tension between professional investigation and personal testimony. The New York Times gives Judah the habits of inquiry with which he approaches Lerner’s death, but the decisive clues emerge from grief, intimacy, bodily memory, and the failure of official explanations. His work enables him to assemble evidence; his life supplies the facts that the public account has concealed.
As a result, the newspaper is neither merely a workplace nor a neutral emblem of truth. It is the institution that helps Judah survive, the source of a curiosity that strains his relationship with Hannah, and the professional framework through which he turns Chaim Lerner’s death into a book. Yet the investigation also shows that journalism cannot begin and end with documents. The truth is recovered when the journalist reinterprets a remembered embrace, a damaged arm, a disputed receipt, and a fall from a balcony as parts of one concealed event.